[ Date Index ][
Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 3:51 pm, John Horne wrote:
one copy of tinydns i'm running is using under 2 mb of ram for 11,543 records.That's the other dns I was trying to think of - tinydns!
MaraDNS is also another funky DNS server i like a lot ;)
I'm a little lost with this. I assume the server is caching records it finds and is under 2MB? In order to cache more records I think I'd rather it used more memory. I could of course just configure BIND to use 2MB for caching :-)
according to it's faq: It loads data from disk on demand, relying on the UNIX kernel's buffer cache to keep frequently used data in memory. In contrast, BIND needs to load all your zone files into memory before it answers any queries. ~ Theo ;) -- Theo Zourzouvillys Research and Development Notnet Limited You will inherit some money or a small piece of land. -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the message body to unsubscribe.