D&C Lug - Home Page
Devon & Cornwall Linux Users' Group

[ Date Index ][ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

RE: [LUG] Re: Red Hat 7.2



On 26-Oct-2001 at 15:40:29 MATTHEW BROWNING wrote:
>> no wonder I could get no work done when I was at plynouth
>> uni...!!!8-)
>>
> No more gets done by staff (John night disagree).
> 
As a member of Uni computing service staff I must say that it is all damn
lies!! :-)

But from a personal note, and these are my comments not the Uni's, etc, etc,
past network performance has been atrocious for both staff and students. I
have had all the same problems that others have had! :-( However, two things
have now happened. The JANET link out from us has been increased, previously
we used a shared 100MB (I think) link. This was the root of most of the
problems due to its saturation. Secondly we are moving to a cisco switched
network (aka plymnet4), still with the ATM ring, but with 1GB
interconnections and 100MB full-duplex connections to workstations/servers
werever possible. In the light of the former I can now easily download (for
example) solaris patches (approx 40MB) during the day with no problem. With
the latter improvement (still to be be done to my pc), the general access
should be even quicker. IPX can still be a problem with the netware servers
and connectivity between plymnet3 and 4 can be a source of problems. The
cisco stuff I should add seems to be far more reliable than previous
newbridge equipment (which is still a source of problems around the Uni).
The main route server is still (currently) running newbridge software (sigh).

Apparently I'm to be running the network management systems but still have
little idea about the actual network...:-) Not really a networking person
you see, a systems person myself...

Depending on which part of the Uni you reside will depend if you currently
have plymnet4 access. The entire Uni, and external sites, will be using
plymnet4 by the end of January.

> I get kernels and other bits here (really quickly) but I have often 
> been concerned about grabbing a whole distribution because it says in 
> this staff booklet I have that you are not allowed to download any 
> sort of executable. 
> 
I think what this is really referring to is where a student downloads some
unknown executable and installs it onto a PC without any real idea of what
it is or is going to do. Staff are, I believe, expected to exercise some
caution before running executables, and if you can do it on a standalone PC
and/or private network then so much the better. In the case of downloading
something like redhat 7.2 iso images I think the only problem was network
performance. I'm sure it (the statement) didn't mean not to download any
executable, and if you want to download 7.2 then do so :-)


John.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK           Tel: +44 (0)1752 233914
E-mail: jhorne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP key available from public key servers

--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the
message body to unsubscribe.


Lynx friendly